Solutions and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are now reviving these kinds of systems. Out of lie recognition tools tested at the boundary to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being utilized in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to navigate these devices and to follow their legal right for coverage.

It also demonstrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering these people from being able to access the stations of security. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms for these technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who are disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article argues that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: whilst they help to expedite the asylum process, they also help to make it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.